Home MarketsStatisticsArctic Shipping Fish transportation by the Northern Sea Route: prospects and pitfalls

Fish transportation by the Northern Sea Route: prospects and pitfalls

by admin

The “Harmonia”

Fish transportation by the Northern Sea Route: prospects and pitfalls

Following Vladimir Putin’s statement of the necessity to establish regular transportation of fish products by the Northern Sea Route, Rosatom, Rosrybolovstvo and fishing companies outlined the conditions under which a regular fish line would be efficient in the Arctic.

On 20 May 2020, at a meeting chaired by the Russian President, Interim Governor of the Kamchatka Territory said that potential fish transportation along the Northern Sea Route was estimated at 250,000-300,000 tonnes per year. At the first phase, in summer-autumn fishing season of Pacific salmons, it can be as much as 50,000-60,000 tonnes per year.

In 2019, fishery industry of the Kamchatka Territory produced 1.2 million of product with almost 900,000 tonnes of domestic consumption. It is central Russia that accounts for the bulk of consumption which is a prerequisite for the above-mentioned project.

Vyacheslav Ruksha, Deputy Director of Rosatom – Director of Rosatom’s Northern Sea Route Directorate, said that ice-breaking LASH/container carrier Sevmorput will be able to make one voyage on the Murmansk – Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky – Murmansk route in 2020 taking into account the operations planned earlier. According to preliminary schedule the nuclear-powered ship will leave Murmansk on 15 August 2020 and will reach Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky on August 30. The ship will return to Murmansk on September 13 with unloading of fish product expected to last till September 15. The ship is to carry 204 FEU and 153 TEU containers.

It should be noted that Rosatom is ready to consider a decrease of profitability in 2020 up to 1% of daily voyage cost.

The “Sevmorput”

According to earlier statements of Vyacheslav Ruksha, “the key issues are the return load of the container carrier, availability of port infrastructure for handling reefer containers and frequency of voyages”.

For a regular line (several voyages in summer-autumn season), Vyacheslav Ruksha says, it is necessary to ensure a return load or a compensation of income lost by a ship owner in case of underloading, as well as involvement of a single cargo consolidator. Such a consolidator could plan the loading of ships operating on the line, accumulate shiploads and provide additional services to cargo owners.

Rosatom has already succeeded in arranging fish transportation by the Arctic route. Between 20 August and 15 September 2019, Sevmorput made a voyage from the terminal of Vostochnaya Stevedoring Company in Vostochny Port to the Seroglazka terminal in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky and further to Petrolesport terminal in Big Port St. Petersburg. The ship transported more than 5,000 tonnes of fish products in 204 forty-foot reefer containers 66 containers with other cargoes.

The voyage lasted for 26.85 days including 19.2 sea days and 7.66 port days. The ship covered 7,880.6 nm with an average speed of 17.11 knots.

Prior to this voyage, Russian Government signed a special decree to include Vostochny and Nakhodka into the list of seaports allowed for calls of ships with nuclear-powered plants.

When speaking at the meeting on May 20, СEO of Rosatom Aleksey Likhachev said that nuclear-powered carrier Sevmorput would be able to make up to four voyages of that kind per year.

Maxim Kulinko, Head of Rosatom’s Department for Development of NSR and Costal Territories, in his turn, told IAA PortNews that arrangement of regular fish shipping along the Northern Sea Route requires “addressing the issue of loading ships with various containerized cargo for a return voyage from the European part of the Russian Federation to the Far East since the line is economically inefficient without a return cargo flow.

Maxim Kulinko is currently analyzing possible types of cargo. All the regions interested in shipping by the Northern Sea Route have presented their potential return load cargoes.

According to him, there is a task to set this line ‘rolling’. “We see that the fishing company’s economy is different from that of shipping companies. And they cannot be correlated. We believe that a cost-effective model can be developed within a coming years to ensure profit for all the stakeholders”, says Maxim Kulinko.

Yury Trutnev, Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation – Presidential Plenipotentiary Envoy to the Far Eastern Federal District appreciated the efforts of Rosatom and gave instructions to develop appropriate measures of state support.

Among the urgent problems is the tariff for icebreaker assistance in the Northern Sea Route waters. RF Government has given instructions to look into reduction of tariffs for transportation of fish products.

FSUE Atomflot (a 100% subsidiary of Rosatom) has expressed readiness to consider flexible tariff policy depending on seasonal conditions, number and capacity of vessels if the number of applications for shipping grows to 100,000 tonnes per year. Rosatom acknowledged it reasonable to apply a 0.5 coefficient in summer-autumn period, as in the case with the assistance to research ships.

“This tariff-setting mechanism should be well balanced with a preliminary defined source for compensation of income lost by Atomflot”, says Maxim Kulinko.

It should be noted that Sevmorput was not assisted by any icebreakers when carrying fish in 2019 due to its high ice class (Arc5) and technical characteristics.

Nevertheless, frozen fish can be alternatively carried along the Northern Sea Route by the Progress, Symphony and Harmony reefers with DWT of 3,642 / 3750 / 3,642 tonnes accordingly.

From 2015, those ships have made five voyages of that kind. Icebreaker assistance services cost between RUB 2.7 million and RUB 3.2 million depending on the scope of assistance and characteristics. All in all, the reefers carried 14,000 tonnes of frozen ship with general cost of icebreaker assistance as high as 1 ruble per a kilogram.

At the same time, the cost of fish transportation by reefers is at least 15 rubles per kilogram not including the cost of icebreaker assistance.

So, with a RUB 44 million freight rate of a reefer, icebreaker assistance makes only 6% of the total costs.

Therefore, reduction of icebreaker assistance cost through application of 0.5 coefficient will not result in a considerable reduction of total fish shipping costs.

Prearranged ship traffic allowing for planning of cargo transportation in both directions would contribute to reduction of total shipping costs.

Apart from the issue of return load and icebreaker assistance, availability of stevedoring and storage facilities is crucial. As IAA PortNews was informed by Rosrybolovstvo, the issue is essential for both sea terminals and hinterland facilities in central Russia.

Besides, the project on transportation of fish products by the Northern Sea Route foresees the involvement of Seroglazka terminal in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. The terminal with a total area of 88,000 square meters has a freezing capacity of 2,000 tonnes (with a facility for 7,000 tonnes under construction) and a refrigerating yard for 400 containers. Sevmorput can be accommodated at the terminal’s 1,500-meter long berth with the depth of up to 10 meters.

Vitaly Chernov, Editor-in-Chief, IAA PortNews

You may also like

Leave a Comment