Home EnergyAlternative Sources of Energy ESPO Concerned About Obligation to Equip Core Ports with LNG Facilities

ESPO Concerned About Obligation to Equip Core Ports with LNG Facilities

by admin

ESPO LNG FACILITIES PORTS CONCERNThe Commission launched today the so-called ‘Clean Fuel for Transport Package’. This consist of a Communication on a European alternative fuels strategy and a proposed Directive on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure.

An accompanying document describes the action plan for the development of LNG in shipping. The package addresses all transport modes and its overall aim is to diminish Europe’s dependency on oil for its mobility and transport.

For maritime transport, the legislative package focuses on the development of Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) infrastructure and the promotion of shore side electricity for vessels at berth.

Within the proposed Directive, the Commission introduces an obligation for TEN-T core seaports to be equipped by 2020 with publicly accessible LNG refueling points for both maritime and inland waterway transport. A similar obligation is introduced for core inland ports by 2025.  In addition, the Commission introduces a more generic requirement for ports to be equipped with shore side electricity installations for waterborne vessels, provided this would be cost-effective and effectively lead to environmental benefits.

ESPO supports the development of LNG as a viable and green alternative fuel for ships and acknowledges that shore side electricity for vessels at berth is one of the potential solutions to address local air quality challenges in ports. ESPO therefore welcomes the fact that funding would be made available through the TEN-T calls for the further development of such projects.

ESPO however doubts whether imposing LNG refueling infrastructure in all TEN-T core ports would be appropriate, since there may not be a market for it in all of those ports, whereas there could be a market in other, non-core ports. “We believe that LNG refueling points should be developed in those ports where this actually makes sense”, said ESPO Secretary General Patrick Verhoeven, “We are concerned that imposing the development of EU co-funded LNG infrastructure in all core ports may in certain cases lead to the development of largely unused or underused facilities.”

In addition, ESPO considers that alternative solutions to the development of LNG and shore side electricity are and will become increasingly available in the near future. While fully supporting the aim of improving the environmental performance of maritime transport, ESPO believes that there are not‘silver bullet’ type of solutions and that, therefore, a closer examination of the actual needs of individual ports is necessary.

You may also like

Leave a Comment